Should poverty be considered in 'diyat' imposition, asks top court.

Byline: Hasnaat Malik

ISLAMABAD -- The Supreme Court of Pakistan (SC) has posed a question: Can a convict be indefinitely detained for failure to pay the 'diyat' on account of his poverty?

A two-judge bench led by Justice Qazi Faez Isa has raised certain legal questions for adjudication in a matter wherein an individual named Shakeel Abbas had been convicted under Section 316 of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) for 'qatl shibh-i-amd', and sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment and payment of 'diyat' under PPC Section 323 in the amount of Rs2,174,577.

The PPC's Section 316 says whoever commits qatl shibh-i-amd shall be liable to pay 'diyat' and may also be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to twenty-five years as ta'zir. Section 323 of the PPC is on the value of 'diyat'.

Legal questions

Justice Isa, while authoring the 3-page order, has asked whether a convict could be detained indefinitely if he failed to pay the 'diyat' on account of his poverty and whether such detention was in accordance with the injunctions of the Holy Qur'an and Sunnah, a requirement Section 323 of the PPC states must be fulfilled.

The order also noted that the PPC's Section 323 requires the federal government to keep 'in view the financial position of the convicts' in fixing the value of 'diyat'. However, notifications issued thereunder simply fix the same 'diyat' amount payable by all convicts alike, i.e. the value of 30,630 grams of silver, and do not distinguish between convicts who can pay and those who cannot who then, on account of their inability to pay, remain incarcerated indefinitely.

The court order states that Rule 11 of the Diyat, Arsh and Daman Fund Rules, 2007 ('the Rules') permits a convict 'to be released on such terms and conditions as may be determined by the court for payment of remaining amount' after making 'part payment' and 'the court may pass an order for detention of the convict if he fails to fulfil the terms and conditions for release'.

'The question arises what constitutes 'part payment', what kind of 'terms and conditions' can be imposed and whether on account of the financial inability of the convict the Court can pass an order for his detention', says the order.

Directions

The court has issued notice to the Attorney General for Pakistan, Advocate General, Punjab and the Prosecutor General Punjab as these legal points require interpretation of the PPC and the Rules.

A notice has also been issued to the Ministry...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT