SC admits former IHC judge Siddiqui's petition against sacking.

Byline: Hasnaat Mailk

ISLAMABAD -- The Supreme Court on Thursday admitted a constitutional petition filed by former Islamabad High Court judge Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, challenging his removal from the judicial office.

Justice Azmat Saeed dismissed the objections put forth by the SC registrar office during an in-chamber appeal.

In October 2018, President Arif Alvi sacked Siddiqui under Article 209(5) on the SJC recommendation under Article 209(6) read with Article 48(1) of the Constitution. The SJC recommended his sacking for displaying conduct unbecoming of a high court judge over July 21 speech at the District Bar Association, Rawalpindi in which he targeted the country's top spy agency.

IHC's Justice Siddiqui appears before SJC

The sacking

The report compiled by the SJC on Siddiqui's removal noted that 'nothing can be more damaging to the country's judicial system than an allegation levelled by a high court judge that the apex court was being controlled from outside'.

It added that 'such reckless and irresponsible conduct of a high court judge was not countenanced by any standard of judicial propriety and the Code of Conduct in this country is no exception in that regard'.

The council questioned the justice's motive for meeting with army officials. It wondered why Siddiqui 'received or entertained' army officers at his residence and discussed judicial matters with them. 'Why did the judge not initiate proceedings against (those) military officers for committing contempt or discussing the matter with the chief justice?'

'It appears that in his desire for publicity of his own virtues he outran his discretion and in the process he tried to cut down the very branch on which he was himself perched,' the SJC report stated.

The SJC report asserted that Siddiqui's 'understanding that an intelligent agency ... was ... powerful enough to influence the majority of the members of constitutional bodies (the SC, IHC and SJC) ... appeared to us (to be) naive, to say the least.'

It stated that Siddiqui's public denunciation of the judiciary had lowered the public...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT