Bracing for an imminent legal showdown.

ISLAMABAD -- A showdown is expected between constitutional institutions next week as the Supreme Court is likely to take a final decision about holding polls for the Punjab Assembly amid a protest against its alleged partiality by the ruling parties on Monday.

It is learnt that despite clear orders of the Supreme Court, the parliament has not provided it the transcript of its debates on the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023.

However, the relevant standing committee's debate was available on the National Assembly website has been shared with the eight-judge bench hearing pleas against the piece of legislation.

A cabinet member revealed to The Express Tribune that NA Speaker Raja Pervez Ashraf has already formed a committee of lawmakers to deliberate whether transcript of a parliamentary debate should be submitted in the SC.

The committee's report will be shared with the house which will take a final decision in this regard.

Last week, the eight-judge larger bench led by Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial asked Attorney General for Pakistan Mansoor Awan to share the transcript of the debates of the parliament by May 9.

The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) led government and powerful circle are upset over manner in which the SC came to the rescue of former premier Imran Khan after he was rounded up from the premises of Islamabad High Court (IHC) on the order of the top accountability watchdog on May 9.

Following the SC order, the head of the ruling parties' alliance Mualana Fazlur Rehman announced a sit-in to be staged in front of the Supreme Court building on Monday.

A three-judge bench led by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial will also take up the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) review petition tomorrow ( Monday) against the bench's April 4 order for holding polls in Punjab on May 14.

Both the federal government as well as the ECP has failed to comply with the order. A senior lawyer believe that the SC's Monday proceeding will be crucial

'The SC can reverse its April 4 order but it may also initiate proceedings over its non-implementation of its April 4 order. However, the chances of the SC reversing its April 4 order are slim.

'If the court initiates contempt proceedings then the controversy over SC's March 1 order will resurface. Contempt petition may also be filed over non issuance of the order of the court and non-implementation of 4-3 judgment in elections matter.'

Some senior lawyers said...