Tarar Terms CM's Election Victory As Per Law, Constitution.

LAHORE -- Punjab Home Minister Attaullah Tarar has claimed that the success of Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) in election for the Punjab chief minister slot is in accordance to the law and Constitution. Addressing a press conference at Model Town here on Saturday, he said that justice should not have double standards. He said that 25 Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) members of the provincial assembly were de-seated on the basis of a reference, sent by the party head against them. 'Where did it prove that these 25 members were directed to vote for Chaudhry Parvez Elahi,' he asked. He said that if a direction was given to these de-seated members then what about those who boycotted the election of the chief minister Punjab last time. He said that the PTI and Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q) members had been directed to cast their votes in favour of Chaudhry Parvez Elahi during the last election of the chief minister Punjab. Did they not violate those directions by abstaining from the CM election, he raised another question. The minister said that yesterday (Friday), the deputy speaker read out the votes tally cast during the previous election for the chief minister's office.

He read out from the Assembly record that Parvez Elahi got zero votes, and at that time neither the PML-Q nor the PTI disputed that statement, as they had boycotted the elections. He said that these were some important questions and their replies should come.

Tarar said that it was a constitutional matter and its interpretation was necessary. He said that the judges, who already heard the matter, had a particular opinion in this regard. So, it was necessary that either a larger or full bench should hear the petition, he added.

The minister added that he wanted to ask a question from these political parties which had been creating a constitutional crisis in the province for the last four months: 'why did they go to the court today?' He said that in Mian Nawaz Sharif's case, it was clarified that a party head had unlimited powers. He said that such past cases and present matters of...