SC dismisses govt plea to set aside SHC order barring action on sugar commission report.

ISLAMABAD -- The Supreme Court of Pakistan on Thursday rejected the federal government's petition challenging the Sindh High Court (SHC) decision which prevented it from taking action against sugar mill owners in the light of recommendations by Sugar Inquiry Commission report.

The apex court's two-member bench headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Gulzar Ahmed heard the case on Thursday on the plea filed by federal government against the Sindh High Court's decision which had stopped the government from taking action against sugar mill owners held responsible for the sugar price hike earlier this year.

In Thursday's hearing, the government's lawyer Attorney General for Pakistan Barrister Khalid Jawed Khan asked the court to see whether the commission was impartial and also heard the stance of the sugar mill owners.

However, the AGP replied that there was no need to listen their stance as it was a fact-finding commission. He added that the report was an eye-opener, adding that all executive authorities have been activated against it.

The chief justice inquired as to how the SIC report can impact the mill owners, asking them about their concerns on the matter.

The CJP then turned to the lawyer for the sugar mill owners Makhdoom Ali Khan Advocate and asked him why he seeks a stay order as it was just a report by the commission.

Makhddom Ali Khan then responded saying that the executive action has been challenged by some sugar mill owners in various courts. He added that reaching out too the high courts was not out of the ordinary.

Justice Gulzar Ahmed added that the situation was caused by the government itself as it opens an inquiry which leads to court cases.

Meanwhile, Justice Ijazul Ahsan once again asked Makhdoom Ali Khan why the sugar mill owners approached the SHC after reaching out to IHC.

Advocate Makhdoom Ali Khan said that the Sugar Mills Association had approached the Islamabad High Court in its personal capacity and the commission only provided recommendations.

'If there are impactful fact-findings in any report then a claim can be made,' he told the judges.

To which Justice Ajazul Ahsan said that apparently the SIC did fact-finding and it identified 'deal' and several other aspects.

'If the state institutions issue show-cause notice then present your stance over there,' said the judge.

The CJP then remarked that so far no action has been taken against any sugar mills. 'Sugar mills will get nothing out of declaring the report...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT