Imran defends govt's Covid-19 response Finds no 'confusion' or contradiction in PTI stance; Warns negligence could make matters worse.

Islamabad -- Prime Minister Imran Khan on Thursday defended his government's response to the coronavirus crisis, saying there has been no confusion or contradiction in official policies since the start of the pandemic.

Speaking in the parliament during the budget session, the premier said he had stressed from day one the need to balance measures to fight the virus and preventing people from going hungry.

'They say again and again that there was confusion ... if there was one country whose government did not have confusion, it was ours,' he said.

He said the government had imposed a lockdown to curb the spread of Covid-19 when the country had only 26 cases and no deaths. At that point, he added, the provinces had 'reacted themselves' because lockdown had become a worldwide phenomenon and the country did not have 'centralised planning'.

But he said he and his team feared from day one that the lockdown model used by Western countries and China could not be applied in Pakistan because the situation in the subcontinent was 'very different'.

The prime minister said people give the example of countries like New Zealand when talking about social distancing 'but New Zealand has social distancing already' with a low population density. On the other hand, Pakistan has a high population and eight-nine people often live in one-room houses, he added.

'I said from day one we had a dual problem; we had to save the people from corona and hunger, and those dying from poverty,' he added, acknowledging that his government had to face 'a lot of criticism' at the start and there was pressure, including from cabinet members, to implement a more strict lockdown 'as did by India'.

But he said the data now coming in had shown that the government took the right steps to respond to the health crisis.

Addressing the opposition benches, he challenged their lawmakers to 'point out one statement that had inconsistency' since the lockdown was first announced on March 13.

'I constantly talked about two things: if you have the population of Singapore, if you have $50,000 per capita income [and] if you have natural social distancing, then curfew is the way to go.

'But I also talked about how the restrictions would impact the poor people based on our conditions,' he added.

Recalling that the government did not have any data on...