Defence Counsel presents arguments before SC in Pearl murder case.

ISLAMABAD -- The Supreme Court on Thursday heard contentions of the defence lawyer while hearing appeals against acquittal of the accused by the Sindh High Court in Daniel Pearl murder case.

A bench of the apex court headed by Justice Mushir Alam hearing appeals filed by the Sindh government and parents of Daniel Pearl.

Mehmood Shaikh advocate in his arguments said that the delay in registration of FIR required a strong reason behind it. The FIR of Daniel Pearl's abduction was filed after a delay of 12 days, the counsel of accused said. 'No reason given for this delay in filing the case.'

'All accused were subjected to illegal detention in the case,' the counsel further said.

'Ahmed Omer Saeed was accused of affiliation with a terrorist outfit in newspaper reports,' Justice Yahya Afridi remarked. 'Brief the court over the issue,' Justice Afridi asked defence lawyer. 'I will reply on the matter after contacting with my client,' the counsel said.

'How Ahmed Omer Saeed got a mobile phone in Jail? An answer is also on pending over it,' Justice Sardar Tariq said.

'How can a life term inmate makes a threatening phone call from jail to the president of the country,' Rae Bashir,the counsel of co-accused Salman Saqib, argued.

Salman Saqib had purchased cameras, scanner and printer from Fahad Naseem, while the purchased items have no role in the case, the counsel said.

'If any witness testified against Salman Saqib,' Justice Afridi questioned. 'His name was not taken in any witness account,' counsel Rae Bashir said. 'The prosecution made bundle of lies against accused,' the counsel claimed.

'Fahad Naseem was a...