Can Balochistan PA amend federal law over Reko Diq, wonders SC.

ISLAMABAD -- The Supreme Court on Thursday deliberated over the queAsAAtion whether the Balochistan AsseAmbly enjoyed the legislative competence of encroaching upon the federal jurisdiction to amend a federal law.

A five-member bench, headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial, was hearing the presidential reference on the reconstituted Reko Diq joint venture agreement.

Senior counsel Dr Farogh Naseem, in his capacity as amicus curiae (friend of the court), came up with a solution, suggesting that the amendment in the act be considered as a stand-alone statute.

He said the court, in its answer to the presidential reference, may state that Section 7, inserted by the Balochistan Assembly in the Regulation of Mines and Oilfields and Mineral Development (Government Control) Act (RMOMDA) 1948, does not conflict with the latter.

Counsel says going back to provincial legislature at the moment is 'very difficult'

Being a federal law, the RMOMDA vests subjects like oilfields, gas fields and the nuclear issue in the federation whereas issues like minerals in the provinces.

The CJP, however, observed that the law may not be hybrid and may not be complete on its own, adding it was a provincial law borrowed from the federal act 'head to toe'.

Section 7 says that in matters where there exists an international obligation, the provincial government may in the public interest, for reasons to be recorded in writing, enter into a negotiated agreement on such terms and conditions as may be agreed upon by it.

The amendment stated that the provincial government will also have the power to implement such a negotiated agreement, including without limitation by the grant or renewal of any licence, lease or other right granted.

It also explained that the negotiated agreement will mean a commercial agreement between one or more persons and the provincial government entered into through private negotiation and without public tendering regarding the grant of a licence, lease or other rights to explore, prospect mine, refine, develop, process, export, exploit and sell any mineral or minerals and do any and all other things in relation to mines and mineral development.

'Correct legislation'

Dr Naseem said the environment was not conducive for the court to hold that the amendment in the 1948 act could be done away with by the federation. He added that both the 1948 act...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT