Amending PECA 2016.

There are reports that the Pakistan Commission for Human Rights (PCHR) in collaboration with UNESCO and the Parliamentary Task force on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), have proposed a set of amendments to the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2016. Reportedly, the focus is on removing Section 34 of the Act, which allows the Executive to interpret Article 19 of the Constitution and exercise censorship against content deemed inappropriate.

The documents stress that constitutional provisions can only be interpreted by the courts, which is correct. The executive cannot be granted powers of interpretation and then the authority to enforce censorship on content arbitrarily judged as inappropriate. It is clear that the exercise of such authority would be highly subjective, and any law that enables officials to pass subjective judgments that arise out of personal bias would lead to inconsistencies and injustice. As the documents in support of the amendment suggest, content management and cybercrime prevention are not the same thing, and the former does not necessarily...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT